Skip to main content

Theory of Impersonality by TS Eliot

Theory of Impersonality

T.S. Eliot’s impersonal conception of art and the fullest expression of his classicist attitude towards art and poetry are essentially given by him in his essay Tradition and the Individual Talent.

Eliot explains his theory of impersonality by examining first, the relation of the poet to the past and secondly, the relation of the poem to its author. According to his view the past is never dead, it lives in the present. “No poet or no artist has his complete meaning alone.
His significance, his appreciation is the appreciation of his relation to the dead poets and artists.” Above all, the artist or the poet has to work in the long established tradition of the literature to which he belongs. We cannot value the poet alone; we must set him for comparison and contrast among the dead poets of his language.

In the next part of the theory he examines the relation of the poet to the poem. According to him, the poem has no relation to the poet. The difference between the mind of a mature poet and an immature one is that, a mature poet has more finely perfected medium. Eliot thinks that the poet and the poem are two separate things. The feeling or emotion or vision resulting from the poem is something different from feeling, emotion, and vision in the mind of the poet. The art emotion is different from personal emotion. In other words the poet should be passive and impersonal.

To explain the theory, Eliot has brought the analogy of chemical reaction. When oxygen and sulphur-di-oxide are mixed in the presence of a filament of platinum, they form sulphurus acid. This combination takes place only when platinum is presence. Platinum is the catalyst that helps to process of chemical reaction, but it itself is apparently unaffected. The mind of the poet is the shred of platinum. Its presence may be necessary for partly or exclusively to operate for the combination of the experience in order to give birth to a piece of poetry.

Eliot says that, the business of the poet is not to find new emotions, but to use the ordinary ones and in working them up in poetry, to express feelings which are not actual emotions at all.

The emotion of art is impersonal. It has its life in the poem and not in the history of poets. So, honest criticism and sensitive appreciation is directed not upon the poet but upon the poetry. The biography of the poet is not to be studied; the structure of the poem and its evocation powers are importan

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

On Destroying the Books: Second Year English, Lesson # 5

Summary J.C. Squire is British poet, critic and a well-known humorous writer. He selects unusual topics and turns them in ridiculous situation to create humor. “On Destroying Books” deals with a simple problem but he presents it in such a beautiful way that it holds the reader in suspense till the end of the story. In this essay, tea writer has told us about his adventure of throwing away the unwanted collection of books.             Mr. Squire beings his story concerning news published in a daily. According to it about two million books were presented to the soldiers. Most of them were ordinary and quite book and old magazines. The writer suggests that lose their charm gradually. These books must be destroyed to make room for new ones. The writer does not consider it an easy task because these do not have as many lives as a cat and they die-hard.            ...
13 comments
Read more

Reference To Context:: Learn it and get 5 out of Five marks

How to do RTC in the paper? Reference:       (According to poem) Context:          (According to Poem) Explanation: In these lines the poet tells about _______________. These lines have many layers of meanings. The upper meaning of these lines is very easy to understand even by the common reader. But the hidden meaning of these lines is complex and thought provoking. In these lines, the poet says that ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ . Rhyme scheme of these lines is ____________________. These lines give us a very important lesson. For Example. Explain the following with reference to context:                               ...
43 comments
Read more

The Man Who Was A Hospital: Lesson # 6, English Second Year

The Man Who Was A Hospital The Man Who was a Hospital" is an example of Jerome’s fine humour. He exaggerates but the story is based upon sound observation of human behaviour. Many persons with a little knowledge of diseases and their symptoms think that they are suffering from such diseases.    Jerome Klapka Jerome was born on May 2,1859. His father name was Jerome clap.He had two sisters and one brother .His father was died when he was only 13 years old and his mother died when he was only 15. He worked in Railway for four years.Then he joined theater with his sister. But after three years whenhe saw no success in theatre he left it.He started towrite stories ,essay and satires.During this time he worked as a teacher in schools,a packer and clerk.   He was an English writer and humorist, His best book is " three men in a boat " which was written in 1889. His second best book was Idol thoughts of an idle fellow.Hisanother book is My life and Times which wa...
3 comments
Read more