Iliad Book 1
Summary
The
poet invokes a muse to aid him in narrating the story of the rage of Achilles,
the greatest Greek hero to fight in the Trojan War. The narrative begins nine
years after the start of the war, as the Achaeans sack a Trojan-allied town and
capture two beautiful maidens, Chryseis and Briseis. Agamemnon, commander-in-chief
of the Achaean army, takes Chryseis as his prize. Achilles, one of the
Achaeans’ most valuable warriors, claims Briseis. Chryseis’s father, a man
named Chryses who serves as a priest of the god Apollo, begs Agamemnon to
return his daughter and offers to pay an enormous ransom. When Agamemnon
refuses, Chryses prays to Apollo for help.
Apollo
sends a plague upon the Greek camp, causing the death of many soldiers. After
ten days of suffering, Achilles calls an assembly of the Achaean army and asks
for a soothsayer to reveal the cause of the plague. Calchas, a powerful seer,
stands up and offers his services. Though he fears retribution from Agamemnon,
Calchas reveals the plague as a vengeful and strategic move by Chryses and
Apollo. Agamemnon flies into a rage and says that he will return Chryseis only
if Achilles gives him Briseis as compensation.
Agamemnon’s
demand humiliates and infuriates the proud Achilles. The men argue, and
Achilles threatens to withdraw from battle and take his people, the Myrmidons,
back home to Phthia. Agamemnon threatens to go to Achilles’ tent in the army’s
camp and take Briseis himself. Achilles stands poised to draw his sword and
kill the Achaean commander when the goddess Athena, sent by Hera, the queen of
the gods, appears to him and checks his anger. Athena’s guidance, along with a
speech by the wise advisor Nestor, finally succeeds in preventing the duel.
That
night, Agamemnon puts Chryseis on a ship back to her father and sends heralds
to have Briseis escorted from Achilles’ tent. Achilles prays to his mother, the
sea-nymph Thetis, to ask Zeus, king of the gods, to punish the Achaeans. He
relates to her the tale of his quarrel with Agamemnon, and she promises to take
the matter up with Zeus—who owes her a favor—as soon as he returns from a
thirteen-day period of feasting with the Aethiopians. Meanwhile, the Achaean
commander Odysseus is navigating the ship that Chryseis has boarded. When he
lands, he returns the maiden and makes sacrifices to Apollo. Chryses, overjoyed
to see his daughter, prays to the god to lift the plague from the Achaean camp.
Apollo acknowledges his prayer, and Odysseus returns to his comrades.
But
the end of the plague on the Achaeans only marks the beginning of worse
suffering. Ever since his quarrel with Agamemnon, Achilles has refused to
participate in battle, and, after twelve days, Thetis makes her appeal to Zeus,
as promised. Zeus is reluctant to help the Trojans, for his wife, Hera, favors
the Greeks, but he finally agrees. Hera becomes livid when she discovers that
Zeus is helping the Trojans, but her son Hephaestus persuades her not to plunge
the gods into conflict over the mortals.
Analysis
Like other ancient epic
poems, The Iliad presents its subject clearly from the
outset. Indeed, the poem names its focus in its opening word: menin, or “rage.” Specifically, The Iliad concerns itself with the rage of
Achilles—how it begins, how it cripples the Achaean army, and how it finally
becomes redirected toward the Trojans. Although the Trojan War as a whole
figures prominently in the work, this larger conflict ultimately provides the
text with background rather than subject matter. By the time Achilles and
Agamemnon enter their quarrel, the Trojan War has been going on for nearly ten
years. Achilles’ absence from battle, on the other hand, lasts only a matter of
days, and the epic ends soon after his return. The poem describes neither the
origins nor the end of the war that frames Achilles’ wrath. Instead, it
scrutinizes the origins and the end of this wrath, thus narrowing the scope of
the poem from a larger conflict between warring peoples to a smaller one
between warring individuals.
But
while the poem focuses most centrally on the rage of a mortal, it also concerns
itself greatly with the motivations and actions of the gods. Even before Homer
describes the quarrel between Achilles and Agamemnon, he explains that Apollo
was responsible for the conflict. In general, the gods in the poem participate
in mortal affairs in two ways. First, they act as external forces upon the
course of events, as when Apollo sends the plague upon the Achaean army.
Second, they represent internal forces acting on individuals, as when Athena,
the goddess of wisdom, prevents Achilles from abandoning all reason and
persuades him to cut Agamemnon with words and insults rather than his sword.
But while the gods serve a serious function in partially determining grave
matters of peace and violence, life and death, they also serve one final
function—that of comic relief. Their intrigues, double-dealings, and inane
squabbles often appear humorously petty in comparison with the wholesale
slaughter that pervades the mortal realm. The bickering between Zeus and Hera,
for example, provides a much lighter parallel to the heated exchange between
Agamemnon and Achilles.
Indeed, in their submission to
base appetites and shallow grudges, the gods of The Iliad often
seem more prone to human folly than the human characters themselves. Zeus
promises to help the Trojans not out of any profound moral consideration but
rather because he owes Thetis a favor. Similarly, his hesitation in making this
promise stems not from some worthy desire to let fate play itself out but from
his fear of annoying his wife. When Hera does indeed become annoyed, Zeus is
able to silence her only by threatening to strangle her. Such instances of
partisanship, hurt feelings, and domestic strife, common among the gods
of The Iliad, portray the gods and goddesses as less
invincible and imperturbable than we might imagine them to be. We expect these
sorts of excessive sensitivities and occasionally dysfunctional relationships
of the human characters but not the divine ones.
The
clash between Achilles and Agamemnon highlights one of the most dominant
aspects of the ancient Greek value system: the vital importance of personal
honor. Both Agamemnon and Achilles prioritize their respective individual
glories over the well-being of the Achaean forces. Agamemnon believes that, as
chief of the Achaean forces, he deserves the highest available
prize—Briseis—and is thus willing to antagonize Achilles, the most crucial
Achaean warrior, to secure what he believes is properly owed to him. Achilles
would rather defend his claim to Briseis, his personal spoil of victory and
thus what he believes is properly owed to him, than defuse the situation. Each
man considers deferring to the other a humiliation rather than an act of honor
or duty; each thus puts his own interest ahead of that of his people,
jeopardizing the war effort.
Comments
Post a Comment